[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item for next week - Member- & Guest- Only Hours

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Sat Jul 16 06:14:57 UTC 2011

That was not the intention at all. That's why in the original email I
wrote, "Please email me and the list with any
questions/concerns/changes you'd like to see. I've tried to make this
a reasonable proposition, but am open to suggestions."


On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:07 PM, rachel lyra hospodar
<rachelyra at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ideas should be judged on their merit, absolutely. However, when  it comes
> to getting a group to adopt and support a difficult guideline of any kind,
> my direct experience has repeatedly been that the amount of energy and
> compliance is directly proportional to the amount of investment and
> ownership that the constituents of the group feel towards the idea.
> Unless you are paying them, or otherwise in a position of authority over
> them.
> The way this idea was presented for public debate felt very much like it was
> already fully formed, and not at all like it was truly being put up for
> compromise.  Whether that was the intention or not, that was the outcome
> from my pov.
> mediumreality.com
> On Jul 14, 2011 7:44 PM, "Al Sweigart" <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list