[Noisebridge-discuss] update on the shrine!

Jason Dusek jason.dusek at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 00:12:15 UTC 2011

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 00:02, Will Sargent <will.sargent at gmail.com> wrote:
> More like the other way around.  People are uncomfortable with "that",
> wherein "that" is a cluster of activities.  The label's interesting,
> but not the main point: whether you call it religion or not, it wasn't
> welcome.

Maybe for you that is the case; but I am speaking to the point
raised by Michael Toren, quoted below.

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 21:26, Michael C. Toren <mct at toren.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:35:30AM -0700, Rameen wrote:
> > It seems like the main issue is that the Church class was being rearranged.
> No.
> The main issue, for many people, was that the shrine was being used in a
> religious context.

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list