Gian Pablo Villamil
gian.pablo at gmail.com
Mon Nov 21 04:44:33 UTC 2011
I like this device:
It autonomously flies a track using GPS guidance, which can be overridden
if necessary. Notice how they strongly encourage using the semi-autonomous
guidance, and recommend direct joystick control only for experts.
Cellular is a good link for something like that, since you're not sending
realtime control data, but rather commands like "hold station at waypoint
#1", "return to launch point", etc.
It would be awkward to have to try to maintain realtime control in a
situation where the operator could be distracted or disrupted.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Gopiballava Flaherty <
gopiballava at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking of something semi-autonomous, capable of hovering and/or
> finding its way home without meat assisting it.
> On-board video recording so that link death doesn't stop the recording is
> essential IMHO.
> Perhaps cellular for the primary link, one way VHF / ham as a backup
> control link? What I like about cellular is that we don't need our own
> infrastructure so it can be deployed anywhere.
> I'd definitely want at least some sort of short range low latency protocol
> for landing if we had to land in adverse conditions.
> gopi at iPhone
> On Nov 19, 2011, at 23:10, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:
> > What would you do if you had a plane over a crowd of people, and the
> authorities decide to shut off all cellular service? Not a good situation.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss