jtfoote at ieee.org
Mon Nov 21 18:18:19 UTC 2011
Among the tools "they" have are "stingrays:" equipment that mimics a
cell tower and allows interception. Why block when you can snoop?
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gopiballava Flaherty
<gopiballava at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:07, Forrest Flanagan <solenoidclock at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd count on 802.11 standards and cell phone radios being hindered in the event of any large police action.
> Intentional interference is, by my reading, against FCC rules. I'd be very surprised if police departments had 802.11 blocking systems.
> For cellular, they may have the ability to turn on a 'public safety has priority' system. I read that the FCC was investigating the BART switchoff.
> gopi at iPhone
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss