[Noisebridge-discuss] Tomorrow night's meeting [Oh you know if it's me it's drama]

Tue Apr 10 07:27:59 UTC 2012

You're going to need someone to 'patch you in' to the meeting via Skypeplease add me to your Skype contacts and I'll take care of it.
SkypeID:  WrongPlanet
--- On Tue, 4/10/12, Justin Doerr <justinsfca at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Justin Doerr <justinsfca at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Tomorrow night's meeting [Oh you know if it's me it's drama]
To: "Ronald Cotoni" <setient at gmail.com>
Cc: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2012, 12:04 AM

CHANGE OF PLANS! 
I just realized that when Kelly emailed to this thread a light-bulb popped up in my head.I am going to communicate via Skype!! Problem solved, I will get to say my piece and NOT have to set foot on the premises of Noisebridge. But I am not going to keep silent about Robert being allowed into the space after he drunkenly tried to STAB people immediately outside of the space a month prior to my incident and yet NOTHING happened to him. I know this to be true because he HIMSELF told me that he did that!!! NOTHING has happened to him but he's still managing to be there bitching about improper projector usage and accusing me of stealing $100, WHICH I NEVER DID!! I'm aware it has already been settled but REALLY?! I don't have to put up with his shit anymore. There is no way I am going to keep hush hush about this, no way, no how. Done as in DONE!!!

-Justin Patrick Doerr
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com> wrote:

I am with Kelly here.  It was specifically agreed that you would not return AT ALL, to noisebridge, until mediation was completed.  It has not.  If you return, it most likely could be construed as trespassing.  If you are going against that agreement, you might also be instantly eligible for an actual ban, since you seem to be unable to satisfactorily complete mediation.  Not that I am a member or have any particular power but I beg you, please reconsider showing up until mediation has been completed.   

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Justin,

Tom is out of town and unable to act as mediator in person. I will be

standing in as his proxy at the upcoming meeting.

You made an agreement with the group that you would not return to the

space without completing some form of mediation satisfactorily. If you

want to start that, you can contact me off-list. If you show up at the

space tomorrow (there's no way we can complete mediation in 24 hours)

that would be very disrespectful, and I don't think people would

respond well.

-Kelly

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:17, Justin Doerr <justinsfca at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh and for the record, now I'm very upset.

> I am putting my foot down and I'm letting everyone know once again that I am

> coming to this meeting to speak out and say what it is that I need to say,

> come hell or high water. I have a right to defend myself goddammit and I'm

> not going to let some little pipsqueaks try and get in my way.

> YES I want to go through the mediation process. NO I don't want to wait

> around until Robert wants to. My heart f***ing bleeds.. It's going to begin

> tomorrow and its going to be hasty... outside of NB and in America, I would

> have a right to a speedy trial. I'm f***ing DONE with this bull****. Over it

> times a million!!!

>

> - Justin Patrick Doerr

>

> On Apr 9, 2012 9:58 PM, "Justin Doerr" <justinsfca at gmail.com> wrote:

>>

>> OK fine Matt, I will indent when a new paragraph needs to be formed.

>> Jesus, enough with being a grammar Nazi!!

>>

>> And yes I'll reread your email if it makes you happy. I am well aware of

>> what I'm doing. I've got a lot of emotional support from friends for making

>> my decision to go about doing this.

>>

>> And Nick you're the one contributing to the drama by threatening to get

>> the police involved. You brought that upon yourself. My sentiments still

>> remain unswayed.

>>

>> On Apr 9, 2012 9:40 PM, "Matt Joyce" <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote:

>>>

>>> Refer to my previous email.  Please.

>>>

>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Justin Doerr <justinsfca at gmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>> > Nick, first off STFU, Robert tried to stab people with a knife when he

>>> > was

>>> > in a position where he was as drunk as I was, if I recall you were

>>> > there for

>>> > that situation....I don't see why you're defending him when you are

>>> > aware

>>> > that THAT happened as well. I'm not interested in trying to cause

>>> > drama, I'm

>>> > just going to the meeting to voice my opinion and leave immediately

>>> > after.

>>> > THAT IS attempted murder, which according to my friend who works at the

>>> > DAs

>>> > office of San Francisco, is what attempting to stab someone is. And to

>>> > me

>>> > trying to stab someone is far more heinous of a crime in my book than

>>> > spitting on someone. I've already told him if he doesn't feel

>>> > comfortable

>>> > then he CAN LEAVE, as can you!! Get the police involved. See what

>>> > happens.

>>> > I'll willingly press charges on him as well, because at this point I

>>> > don't

>>> > care!! According to my friend who works for the DA of San Francisco,

>>> > the

>>> > worst that will happen to me is I'll get a slap on the wrist, whereas

>>> > he

>>> > could face incarceration ESPECIALLY considering I have proof from an

>>> > anonymous person who witnessed that he did that. In fact, I'll call the

>>> > police before you even get a chance to tomorrow night before the

>>> > meeting and

>>> > I'll have them escort me into the building if I have to. I don't want

>>> > things

>>> > to get ugly and I don't want to get the police involved in this at ALL,

>>> > especially considering that's not the ONLY thing I have that I can use

>>> > against Robert. BUT GO AHEAD Be a punk, see what happens when you do.

>>> > Same

>>> > thing can be said to Robert, be a punk. See what happens.

>>> >

>>> > On Apr 9, 2012 8:44 PM, "Nicholas Granado" <ngranado at gmail.com> wrote:

>>> >>

>>> >> hi justin,

>>> >>

>>> >> this should be really simple. YOU SPIT ON SOMEONE. that is nasty and

>>> >> offensive. why would anyone want to participate in a community where

>>> >> people

>>> >> could possibly SPIT on you. you should be banned from the space. this

>>> >> should

>>> >> not even be up for debate. it is a travesty that it is up for debate.

>>> >> if i

>>> >> see you in the space (without the mediation being completed or granted

>>> >> permission otherwise) when i'm there i will call the police and make

>>> >> sure

>>> >> you leave.

>>> >>

>>> >> nick

>>> >>

>>> >> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Gavin Knight <gnnrok at gmail.com> wrote:

>>> >>>

>>> >>> As I remember, it was discussed that you would finish mediation

>>> >>> before

>>> >>> trying to

>>> >>> come back to the meetings.

>>> >>>

>>> >>> I trust that, although you would like to share your thoughts about

>>> >>> the

>>> >>> events, you realize that

>>> >>> this situation is between you and Robert, and rehashing this in a

>>> >>> noisebridge does not solve

>>> >>> the dispute.

>>> >>>

>>> >>> Maybe alternatively you could schedule the mediation before or after

>>> >>> the

>>> >>> meeting, and figure

>>> >>> out a solution that way.

>>> >>>

>>> >>> -Gavin

>>> >>>

>>> >>> _______________________________________________

>>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list

>>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net

>>> >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

>>> >>>

>>> >>

>>> >

>>> > _______________________________________________

>>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list

>>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net

>>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

>>> >

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list

> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net

> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

>

_______________________________________________

Noisebridge-discuss mailing list

Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net

https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-- 
Ronald CotoniSystems Engineer

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20120410/2e22c8ee/attachment-0003.html>