[Noisebridge-discuss] A modest proposal.

[Will Sargent]

There is never going to be a silver bullet solution to security in the
space.  There's always a way around any single security measure, but even
the simplest security can have an effect.

Will.

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:13 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:

>
>
>    kind of the same problem: who'll be paying attention
> and take the responsibility to notify all concerned (the
> errant member, the community).
>    we can leave it to chance that someone who cares will
> be there, aware, and upstanding. That's sometimes the
> case.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:51 -0700, Gopiballava Flaherty wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 2012, at 4:22 PM, jim wrote:
> >
> > >    If the door (at the top of the stairs) is always
> > > locked, then make a rule that whoever lets a personage
> > > in is responsible for that personages activities and
> > > general excellence.
> > >    (Trouble is, how to enforce the rule.)
> >
> > If a member refuses to pay attention to their guests, then I would
> expect them to be warned and then eventually told that they should no
> longer invite guests.
> >
> > If a member continues to invite axe wielding maniacs into the space, and
> refuses to cease inviting them, then I'd say that the member themselves
> would have to be kicked out. I don't think this is that likely, though.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20120210/92a3c264/attachment-0003.html>