[Noisebridge-discuss] moderating claypool

[Mike Schachter]

Given the response to this thread, there is no other conclusion than
that Andy Isaacson is himself Lord Claypool, and started the thread
to garner more attention to his troll alter-ego.

  mike





On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:33 AM, maestro <maestro415 at gmail.com> wrote:
> # you Americans???
> # how does he even know the nationality of everyone (rhetorical)???
> # NB is like America. if you don't like it NO ONE is forcing YOU to stay...
> # feel free to get the fuck out.
> # classes going on all day and evening today...
> # now that's fucking NB excellence.
>
> end comments
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Eric W. Rasmussen <ewr at majortek.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Wow, Mr. Claypool, you are really dumb. Freedom of Speech does not mean
>> Freedom From Consequence.
>>
>> I've been advocating on your behalf, without knowing who you are, for
>> censure. Not censorship. And the first thing you did was attack our country
>> and integrity. We were giving you the chance to ingratiate yourself and you
>> did the exact opposite.
>>
>> If you can't keep me on your side, you're fucked. What a disappointment
>> you are.
>>
>> The full wrath of the collective is descending upon you and I won't help.
>>
>> I vote for dismissal.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/26/2012 09:57 AM, lordclaypool wrote:
>>
>> "We don't like what Claypool says.. lets censor him!"
>>
>> You Americans really are like your media. You see something you don't
>> like, you censor it, then you pat yourselves on the back and say good job.
>>
>> Real progressive. Where did you learn your skills? Fox news?
>>
>> Helping rebuild society and yours truly,
>> Lordth Claypool
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Over the last two months, several of us have asked "Lord Claypool" to
>>> stop being an asshole on the mailing list.  He's generally been an ass
>>> in response to such requests, and has generally continued to be a net
>>> negative list contributor, without any redeeming positive qualities.
>>>
>>> As a result, I'm planning to set his moderate flag.
>>>
>>> Let me know if anybody has an objection to this action.  I'd also like
>>> to hear if you're in favor of this action, but off-list please; there's
>>> no reason to have a huge "me too" thread.
>>>
>>> Also, I'd like to hear how people would like this to be handled in the
>>> future; this post is of course a huge drama magnet which I'd like to
>>> avoid, but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of removing posting
>>> privileges without any public disclosure.  Maybe I should just get over
>>> that hang-up.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -andy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>