[Noisebridge-discuss] moderating claypool
Jake
jake at spaz.org
Wed Jun 27 22:09:16 UTC 2012
If you are unwilling to come to noisebridge for mediation, and you're
unwilling to moderate yourself to stop being a pain in the ass to
everyone, it seems you're just using our mailing list to please yourself
by annoying others.
That's a really lame use of our mailing list and I will ask that you be
cut off. I don't see what we would be losing by doing that.
I am offended by something you said. Either participate in mediation or
GTFO.
-jake
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, lordclaypool wrote:
> Would you like to pay for transporting me there? Because if not it's either
> censor me or rob me.
>
> I still don't get why censoring is ever necessary. Cant you just censor on
> your end and leave the discussions truly open?
>
> "deanonymizing" , "assimilated " <-- aww that's cute, kittens, meow meow :)
>
> -L0rD
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:00 PM, miloh <froggytoad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:33 PM, lordclaypool
> <lordclaypool at gmail.com> wrote:
> What difference? You got nothing better to do?
>
>
> Nope, I love Noisebridge and I like to help out, so I can mediate your
> dispute. If you don't want me to do it personally, someone else could
> step up.
>
> For me, the key thing here is that I suspect you will balk at the
> deanonymizing effect of meeting us. But you would have to show up to
> settle this whole schemozzle. If you don't, then your voice on this
> list will likely be censored. Kind of a catch-22 if this is true, you
> will either be censored, or assimilated
>
> I think we are almost done here. :-)
>
>
> -rma
>
>
>
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list