[Noisebridge-discuss] /missing/...
jim
jim at well.com
Thu Mar 1 19:53:50 UTC 2012
Sounds good to me!
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 11:39 -0800, Gopiballava Flaherty wrote:
> What about laptops? I'll bet laptops with broken screens are readily available. They could be used for configurations that need lots of slower devices. I can probably donate a dozen or more USB 1.1 to Ethernet converters so we could have low speed but complex configurations.
>
> I'd love a resource like this to play with.
>
> Thanks,
>
> gopi at iPhone
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 11:17, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > One of the considerations that we in turing have
> > discussed is electrical power: our plan is to have
> > equipment available but not always on, rather mostly
> > off, to be used for a few hours each week as part of
> > a regularly scheduled class.
> > We've also looked at low-power machines such as
> > ARM- or Atom-based systems. It seems good to have
> > one machine capable of supporting VMs (Linux KVM)
> > and one or two other machines that can serve as
> > hosts on "other" LANs.
> >
> > Note that working in a classroom allows more
> > people to participate in the physical aspects of
> > learning along with the convenience of the use of
> > a projector and whiteboard at hand.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:28 -0800, Ben Kochie wrote:
> >> We've done most of the work to isolate the "important" networking away
> >> from the main rack. There are still a few things that people rely on
> >> in the rack so it's not exactly safe.
> >>
> >> A few of us in the noiseops group have talked about replacing the
> >> existing rack wtih a smaller 9U cabinet mounted above the closet
> >> instead of the 20U rack on the floor. The only thing stopping us is a
> >> bit of budget money to buy the rack and a few related items to reduce
> >> our server footprint to this smaller rack.
> >>
> >> The other issue with setting up a dedicated experimental network rack
> >> is the power cost. Running a rack of servers/networking gear would be
> >> 1000-1500 watts of power. That's another $120-180/month in power
> >> costs.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 09:37, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> (Summarizing prior discussions: ) The argument against
> >>> using the existing rack is that it subjects the noisebridge
> >>> LAN to people screwing up. Having a separate "lab" space
> >>> lets people configure multiple LANs and subnets and learn
> >>> not only the physical aspect but the logical aspect
> >>> (configuration and use of various software tools) without
> >>> risking screwing up the LAN that everybody else in the
> >>> space uses for internet access.
> >>>
> >>> I believe that we as a community should isolate the
> >>> elements of infrastructure and respect the maintenance
> >>> (hard work by a few) and not feel like we can turn
> >>> anything and everything into a robot. This is on the order
> >>> of cleaning toilets, maintaining saw blades and drill
> >>> bits, the LAN, the electronic tools, the sewing machines,
> >>> and so on so that people can use them to do interesting
> >>> things.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 23:31 -0800, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> >>>> Hmm. I like the idea of a place to learn how to properly rack servers
> >>>> and even moreso of proper cabling. Now, I am wondering if we could
> >>>> use the rack in the electric closet as an example or something like
> >>>> that. I mean it would be just like working with live stuff. Would
> >>>> breaking something in the electrical closet break internet for
> >>>> everyone?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:25 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 22:16 -0800, Brian Morris wrote:
> >>>>> I'd sort of reconciled myself to laptops, somebody gave an
> >>>> ancient one
> >>>>> (900mhz) but I need a 15volt 4 amp powerbrick. I already
> >>>> went through
> >>>>> the bins on Tuesday afternoon. It could use a stick of pc100
> >>>> 256mB or
> >>>>> two as well. The main problem is parts are expensiver and
> >>>> hard to find
> >>>>> and graphics cannot be updated.
> >>>>
> >>>> JS: seems to me easy enough to make a power supply that's 15V
> >>>> at 4A
> >>>> with what's lying around. Not pretty, only clumsily portable,
> >>>> but
> >>>> do-able. Finding the RAM is a matter of luck, I'm guessing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If there is space in an electrical closet for storage,
> >>>> perhaps we
> >>>>> could establish some basic policy and post it where people
> >>>> can see it.
> >>>>> Labels including a recent date and contact info - or else
> >>>>
> >>>> JS: I'm confused. why an electrical closet? to store what?
> >>>> The bins and shelves around the electronic equipment
> >>>> have various hackable gizmos. I think the policy is to grab
> >>>> something and tear it apart, use what you like, then put
> >>>> what you've built in some safe place (like your house or,
> >>>> if you're brave, "your member shelf"). I'm guessing you
> >>>> have something different in mind.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:44 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What I would like a lot is that we all stop being
> >>>>> hasty. It's easy to get off on doing stuff and
> >>>> making
> >>>>> things better and fighting evil-doers and making
> >>>> things
> >>>>> more in our images and so on.
> >>>>> Take it easier, don't take things too seriously,
> >>>>> relax, accept, focus on a personal creation, even if
> >>>>> the FBI or Salvadore Dali Lama or some pornographers
> >>>>> show up....
> >>>>> I like that the place gets clean and cleaned of a
> >>>>> bunch of crap that piles up, but in the fervor to
> >>>>> accomplish goodness a bunch of people have been hurt
> >>>>> and there's been toxic division. How about making a
> >>>>> point to take more time, not one week but one month.
> >>>>> Sure it takes more time to get less done, but it's
> >>>>> worth protecting the things that matter most--each
> >>>>> others' reasons to be here, no matter how wacky.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 20:33 -0800, Ben Kochie wrote:
> >>>>>> I talked to jim and it is likely the 1U computer
> >>>> was put in
> >>>>> ewaste.
> >>>>>> This is my fault for not reviewing things more
> >>>> closely. My
> >>>>> criteria
> >>>>>> for ewaste is fairly harsh. I have already
> >>>> offered to
> >>>>> replace the
> >>>>>> machine.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 28, 2012 5:57 PM, "maestro"
> >>>> <maestro415 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> # in the bullshit taking shit out of
> >>>> turing the tote
> >>>>> has been
> >>>>>> found and seems to have things in tact,
> >>>> however...
> >>>>>> # the pc tower that was with it has NOT
> >>>> been found
> >>>>> and was
> >>>>>> clearly tagged turing and had cardboard
> >>>> taped over
> >>>>> that...
> >>>>>> # where is this computer?...
> >>>>>> # jim has a single unit computer that
> >>>> belongs to his
> >>>>> friend
> >>>>>> that was in the "rack" room adjacent to
> >>>> the library
> >>>>> where the
> >>>>>> house rack(s) are...
> >>>>>> # where is this computer?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> end comments
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>>>
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>>>
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Ronald Cotoni
> >>>> Systems Engineer
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list