[Noisebridge-discuss] Fwd: drama-o-meter

[Matt Joyce]

Yes but we haven't been tagging threads with the drama tag well so you
don't have a result field in the training set.

That's a huge issue.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mike Schachter
<mschachter at eigenminds.com> wrote:
> Hey MLers,
>
> If anyone is interested in implementing a "drama detection"
> algorithm, we should have an ML meetup about it. There's
> tons of training examples on the archives of the noisebridge-discuss
> list.
>
> At first glance we could probably use tf-idf along with the network
> structure of emails to do unsupervised learning, then train a supervised
> learner on the manually-improved data.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf*idf
>
>  mike
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jake <jake at spaz.org>
> Date: Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:48 PM
> Subject: [Noisebridge-discuss] drama-o-meter
> To: "noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net"
> <noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>
>
> can someone code up a thing that looks at the discuss mailing list traffic
> and measures what portion of it is drama?  it should be easy.
>
> a human will have to declare threads to be drama or not, and if they are,
> and the total traffic for the week exceeds a certain percentage (say 50%)
> the moderation automatically chokes off any further posts on any of those
> threads until the percentage cuts back down.
>
> i view the discuss list on the web portal like this:
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-May/date.html#end
>
> and as you can see, it's really hard to find the hacking-related posts.
>
> -jake
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss