[Noisebridge-discuss] Points of information re: Nitrous Oxide

Tony Longshanks LeTigre anthonyletigre at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 21:33:00 UTC 2012


No, I'm not saying it's bad. I'm saying I don't like it. That's why I
labeled the post "anecdotal."

No, never combined w/ LSd & that's unlikely to happen since my psychedelics
phase ended a long time ago.

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Robert "Finny" Merrill <
rfmerrill at berkeley.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Daniel Pitts <coloraura.com at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It has caused several people to complain, which to me seems likely that
> it
> > breaks to "be excellent" rule.
>
> So anything which causes people to complain is unexcellent? (as far as
> I know only one person seriously complained)
>
> If so, it is trivial to construct a counterexample: something which is
> not unexcellent but which causes people to complain.
>
> If not, what further logical test is satisfied in this case?
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
*You should read my diaries after I die—I talk about you a lot in there.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20121024/354f68fb/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list