[Noisebridge-discuss] cooking timers!
jim
jim at systemateka.com
Mon Aug 26 19:26:07 UTC 2013
Maybe someone can show up at 5 or 6 AM and
roust sleepers.
I'm for taking photos. It's a way to deal
with non-excellence on the sleepers' (and
thieves') parts. How to photo can be polite or
invasive or .... A photo of a repeat sleeper
can be posted to the NB web site as well as
printed for a few copies in the space.
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 12:11 -0700, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> Kevin, you are incorrect. I am pretty sure our lease basically states
> that we are not allowed to "live" there. The law is a great and
> wonderful thing at how it can be interpreted. Since people are
> "sleeping" there (whether living or not), the argument could be made
> that it is an illegal hostel, even if someone sleeps there ONCE, never
> returns and some other person does the same the next day. That could
> result in Noisebridge being shut down. That is extremely unexcellent.
> Honestly, taking a picture of someone is unexcellent but it is less so
> than having noisebridge shut down.
>
>
> An alternative to having pictures taken would be having a group of
> people stay there every night and stay awake all night. They would
> need to do this daily and remember people to keep asking them to
> leave. If you are unwilling to do this, your opinion is invalid. We
> need either photographic evidence or the same person to go EVERY night
> without fail so that we can actually solve this problem. If you ask
> a person one day, then I ask another and another some other day.....
> You get the point. It could be the same person many times. If we
> describe them, they can shave, change their clothes, cut their hair,
> dye their hair....... A picture helps due to the fact we can have
> more defined features (face for example) and use that to determine if
> they have been there.
>
>
>
> Would you like to volunteer to come every night for the next few
> months, stay up all night and help be excellent to help not take
> pictures and keep track of the sleepers? I bet you have a job and
> can't do this. My .02.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Kevin Schiesser <bfb at riseup.net>
> wrote:
> I disagree fully. There is not a no sleeping rule at
> Noisebridge. Be excellent, right? Photographing all sleepers
> is not excellent, and I feel invasive and unnecessary in most
> situations. It's important that an effort with polite but
> firmness is made to awaken sleepers before photographing, and
> certainly before requesting they leave and not come back until
> a Tuesday meeting.
>
> My 2c on protocol. I would be very disappointed if we had a
> queue of sleepers at every Tuesday meeting.
>
> --Kevin
>
>
> On 08/25/2013 02:53 AM, Jake wrote:
> Yes Jim that would help. We need to figure out who
> the people are who are sleeping at noisebridge and ask
> them (when they're awake) to leave until they come
> talk about it at a meeting.
>
> thank you
> -jake
>
> Jim wrote:
>
> Would it help to take photos of sleepers
> and print and post them for the rest of us
> to identify?
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 05:10 -0700, Alexandra Glowaski
> wrote:
> 7:3 sleepers to wakers; polite-but-firmness
> and t.A.T.u both failing.
> This is a solved problem: will try to pick up
> some very irritating
> kitchen timers befor I come in again. I trust
> we all know what to do.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list