[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus proposal: renaming member categories

jim jim at systemateka.com
Sun Dec 8 17:23:28 UTC 2013

[forwarding a sarcasm from someone who 
wants to be anonymous] 
How about Noisebridge Gestapo or NoisebridgeSS? 

[From me] 
    Charles Tang wrote some very well expressed 
criticisms of the Noisebridge activists who seem 
[to me] to be imposing their views on others: 
Tom, Al, Jake (spaz), Danny, and others. 
    I know you activists are driven by 
frustration, but the result is angry and 
inconsiderate; patience is a virtue. 

On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:44 -0800, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> I have proposed the following on the [upcoming consensus items][1] page:
> > Renaming the category “Noisebridge Members” to the “Noisebridge Council”, and
> > renaming the category “Associate Members” to “Noisebridge Members”. This change
> > extends not only to our operations, but also to our bylaws, so that the effect is only
> > a change of name but does not change the rights or privileges of any person or
> > category of people.
> If this topic is of interest to you, I invite you to come discuss it
> on Tuesday. I'm not a huge fan of the string “Noisebridge Council”,
> and would be interested in other options. “Noisebridge High Cabal”,
> perhaps?
> See you Tuesday,
> -Tom
> --
> [1]: https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list