[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus proposal: renaming member categories
asweigart at gmail.com
Sun Dec 8 19:11:18 UTC 2013
Godwin's Law. This thread is officially an unconstructive waste of time.
On Dec 8, 2013 9:23 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> [forwarding a sarcasm from someone who
> wants to be anonymous]
> How about Noisebridge Gestapo or NoisebridgeSS?
> [From me]
> Charles Tang wrote some very well expressed
> criticisms of the Noisebridge activists who seem
> [to me] to be imposing their views on others:
> Tom, Al, Jake (spaz), Danny, and others.
> I know you activists are driven by
> frustration, but the result is angry and
> inconsiderate; patience is a virtue.
> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:44 -0800, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
> > I have proposed the following on the [upcoming consensus items] page:
> > > Renaming the category “Noisebridge Members” to the “Noisebridge
> Council”, and
> > > renaming the category “Associate Members” to “Noisebridge Members”.
> This change
> > > extends not only to our operations, but also to our bylaws, so that
> the effect is only
> > > a change of name but does not change the rights or privileges of any
> person or
> > > category of people.
> > If this topic is of interest to you, I invite you to come discuss it
> > on Tuesday. I'm not a huge fan of the string “Noisebridge Council”,
> > and would be interested in other options. “Noisebridge High Cabal”,
> > perhaps?
> > See you Tuesday,
> > -Tom
> > --
> > : https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss