[Noisebridge-discuss] Added proposal to current consensus items
gregorydillon at gmail.com
Wed Dec 11 01:59:26 UTC 2013
Could you clarify what this means? Its seems well intended, convoluted and
imprecise. Does it suggest retroactively doing something in the future?
Just what is the "original consensus" I could guess, but its not clear.
What is a mutation? I don't want to be a mutation. Isn't $date + 90
before Feb 4, and if so what happens when that bell rings?, do the
Associate Members transform into Capital M members or are they outsiders?
I can see the point of wanting to review a certain consensus item, but I
can't make out what this would do.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Kevin Schiesser <bfb at riseup.net> wrote:
> "Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days, beginning
> October 29, 2013, to the consensus decision to create an Associate Member
> All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a
> second consensus, beginning February 4, 2014. "
> See https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items for details.
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Let's stay in touch. Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss