[Noisebridge-discuss] Neutral Pronoun "E" Version 3

Paul Monad immonad at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 21 05:56:32 UTC 2013

Correction,  my main objection was that Pigeon was 1.  He was asked to leave by Rayc two days before and not return before the next Tuesday meeting.  He did not honor that .  2.  When asked to leave again for that reason by a group of six or seven people he refused.  

Tom blocked my proposal to ban him for those reasons.

It was Pigeon who made me aware of the need for a different pronoun.  That was the original impetus for the use of E.    

On Friday, December 20, 2013 7:54 PM, johny radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:

previously you were lobbying for Pidgeon, who uses
>gender-neutral pronouns to describe eself, to be thrown out of

(i might be off-base here, but....)

Danny, it sounds like you're saying Monad lobbied against Pigeon BECAUSE Pigeon preferred non-gender-specific pronouns. Do you really think so?

That would be like saying that the reason Danny O'Brien lobbied to shut down the kitchen (as you did at a meeting past), it was because Danny doesn't like people who use non-gender-specific pronouns.

I believe None of the above is the case. I believe we three are on the same page about this: our objection is to non-hackers using noisebridge as their personal kitchen. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131220/dd9edd83/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list