[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus proposal: renaming member categories

Romy Snowyla romy at snowyla.com
Mon Dec 9 13:31:55 UTC 2013


The meetings and discuss list are not an accurate reflection of the current mojo at noisebridge . 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 8, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm surprised you noticed, Frantisek. You haven't lived at the space using the DJ booth as your personal bedroom since November 2010.
> 
>> On Dec 8, 2013 5:48 PM, "Frantisek Apfelbeck" <algoldor at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ohh so people are starting to notice? Good.
>>  
>> Frantisek Algoldor Apfelbeck
>> 
>> 
>> biotechnologist&kvasir and hacker
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.frantisekapfelbeck.org
>> 
>> 
>> "There is no way to peace, peace is the way." Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
>> 
>> 
>> On Monday, December 9, 2013 2:23 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>> 
>> [forwarding a sarcasm from someone who 
>> wants to be anonymous] 
>> How about Noisebridge Gestapo or NoisebridgeSS? 
>> 
>> [From me] 
>>     Charles Tang wrote some very well expressed 
>> criticisms of the Noisebridge activists who seem 
>> [to me] to be imposing their views on others: 
>> Tom, Al, Jake (spaz), Danny, and others. 
>>     I know you activists are driven by 
>> frustration, but the result is angry and 
>> inconsiderate; patience is a virtue. 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 18:44 -0800, Tom Lowenthal wrote:
>> > I have proposed the following on the [upcoming consensus items][1] page:
>> > 
>> > > Renaming the category “Noisebridge Members” to the “Noisebridge Council”, and
>> > > renaming the category “Associate Members” to “Noisebridge Members”. This change
>> > > extends not only to our operations, but also to our bylaws, so that the effect is only
>> > > a change of name but does not change the rights or privileges of any person or
>> > > category of people.
>> > 
>> > If this topic is of interest to you, I invite you to come discuss it
>> > on Tuesday. I'm not a huge fan of the string “Noisebridge Council”,
>> > and would be interested in other options. “Noisebridge High Cabal”,
>> > perhaps?
>> > 
>> > See you Tuesday,
>> > -Tom
>> > --
>> > 
>> > [1]: https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Current_Consensus_Items
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131209/c9c9bdb3/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list