[Noisebridge-discuss] Anyone have problems with booting out overnight sleepers in the morning?

[Al Sweigart]

J.C. to clarify, do you think that it's okay if people are hacking and also
sleeping? Or do you include sleeping in the "not hacking" category? And
would you rather I stop booting people out in the morning?

Also, I only boot people out in the early morning, when it is probable that
they've been sleeping there for hours and not just a 15 minute
resting-their-eyes.

Spinach, I agree. But in practice, people who are members and associate
members also crash at the space. :/


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:35 AM, spinach williams <
spinach.williams at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:42 PM, J.C. <r33lmm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a problem with this, if people are causing a problem and sleeping
>> in the space, they should be asked to leave prior to sleeping in the space
>> overnight.
>>
>> If people are here and not involved in hacking on projects, they should
>> be asked to leave, sleeping or not.
>>
> runs the assumption that people who are sleeping are not people who'd
> previously been hacking, which is a bad assumption because it leads to
> addressing fewer than 100% of sleepers. also restricts the definition of
> hacking to whatever an observer believes it to be when policing the space
> -- one benefit of the closed door policy is that ambiguity no longer exists
> ("are you hacking?" becomes "are you a member, or are you sponsored by a
> member?"), so probably invoke that rather than attempt to determine what is
> hacking.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131211/abb8b131/attachment-0003.html>