[Noisebridge-discuss] dreamworks reply

[Jake]

ahh, i see that the asterisk became a bullet-point thanks to wikimedia.

i am glad that our letter is harsh and doesn't grant permission, because i 
think that their letter to us does suggest that they want to dress 
characters in noisebridge t-shirts and have "noisebridgers" endorsing this 
or that. "on t-shirts as wardrobe."

i would like to change the letter we send them from "that hackers like us 
were completely hypocritical nihilists out only for our own egotistical 
ends. " to add at the end of that sentence "or we felt you were suggesting 
to the audience that Noisebridge endorses or espouses a viewpoint that we 
don't, as a collective, agree on."

although it's 01:48 meeting time, and i'm probably too late.

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Jake wrote:

> i notice that we mention that we assume they want to use our logo "not claim 
> you are Noisebridge or that Noisebridge supports your film*. "
>
> I did not see a follow-up to the asterisk, but I would want to clarify to 
> them that we are unlikely to come to a consensus on endorsing/supporting 
> their film as an organization.  Or take out the asterisk altogether.
>
> otherwise, i think it's great.
>
> -jake
>
> danny wrote:
> as per last week's consensus, is here:
>
> this week's meeting should agree on whether we should send it or not
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/DreamworksReply
>
> d.
>
>