[Noisebridge-discuss] Faucet Warning Sticker

[Gopi Flaherty]

You say that no long term studies have been done. But your sticker states harm as a fact. If the harm is as definite as you state, why do you reference the lack of studies, since the conclusion from that would be "we don't know if it's dangerous"
​
Also, why do you call the fluoride industrial? What are the implications or conclusions to be made? Doesn't "industrial" refer more to the size and type of container?  


Thanks,

gopi at iPhone

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 7/8/13, Martin Bogomolni <martinbogo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rather than hash a rehash of a hashed hashtag... I'll leave a well
>> written article from Scientific American instead:
>>
>> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/overthinking-it/2013/05/22/why-portland-is-wrong-about-water-fluoridation/
>>
> "For over 65 years, it has been _rigorously tested_ as a public health measur"
> Bullshit. No long-term controlledhuman studies on fluoridation have
> ever been done.
> And from the linked doc:
> | Drinking water safety is defined and determined by federal,
> | state, and local regulations.
> Yeah. Trust your government, because it knows what's good for you.
> -- 
> Garrett
> Twitter: @xkit
> personx.tumblr.com
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130708/293ce358/attachment-0003.html>