[Noisebridge-discuss] Faucet Warning Sticker
Joe Black
joeblack949 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 9 00:02:08 UTC 2013
i dont know what to believe about fluoridation. However I do know biology and physiology. If fluoride is really toxic, you have the most to worry about when absorbing it through your skins pores while taking a shower, swimming, that kind of stuff :D
joeblack
: 415.494.9563
: joeblack949 at gmail.com
On Monday, July 8, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ronald Cotoni wrote:
> I still think this is the more serious issue. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication This is a real and serious problem with the over abundance of free water in SF, especially at noisebridge. Let's bring this up at the next meeting.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Gopi Flaherty <gopiballava at gmail.com (mailto:gopiballava at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > That's why I'm tired. It explains so much. I thought it was my borderline pathological inability to stop coding and go to sleep on time. Drinking non-fluoridated water is gonna be way easier than a consistent sleep schedule.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > gopi at iPhone
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:40 PM, daravinne <daravinne at gmail.com (mailto:daravinne at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > I will add signs that say "Fluoride in water makes us ALL half-asleep Illuminati slaves! Stop drinking water today! Wake up sheeple!"
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Gopi Flaherty <gopiballava at gmail.com (mailto:gopiballava at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > You say that no long term studies have been done. But your sticker states harm as a fact. If the harm is as definite as you state, why do you reference the lack of studies, since the conclusion from that would be "we don't know if it's dangerous"
> > > > Also, why do you call the fluoride industrial? What are the implications or conclusions to be made? Doesn't "industrial" refer more to the size and type of container?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > gopi at iPhone
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen at gmail.com (mailto:dhtmlkitchen at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > On 7/8/13, Martin Bogomolni <martinbogo at gmail.com (mailto:martinbogo at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > > Rather than hash a rehash of a hashed hashtag... I'll leave a well
> > > > > > written article from Scientific American instead:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/overthinking-it/2013/05/22/why-portland-is-wrong-about-water-fluoridation/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "For over 65 years, it has been _rigorously tested_ as a public health measur"
> > > > > Bullshit. No long-term controlledhuman studies on fluoridation have
> > > > > ever been done.
> > > > > And from the linked doc:
> > > > >
> > > > > | Drinking water safety is defined and determined by federal,
> > > > > | state, and local regulations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah. Trust your government, because it knows what's good for you.
> > > > > --
> > > > > Garrett
> > > > > Twitter: @xkit
> > > > > personx.tumblr.com (http://personx.tumblr.com)
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net (mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net)
> > > > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net (mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net)
> > > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net (mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net)
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net (mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net)
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130708/176521d1/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list