[Noisebridge-discuss] When were bunk-beds installed?

[Romy Ilano]

I'm so confused! The beds were a joke? I saw people installing them and wearing t shirts promoting the bunk bed projects 

But then this was when people were getting hired to promote bitcoins. 

This is a pretty elaborate troll on a troll! :)

---

Romy Ilano
romy at snowyla.com

On Jul 10, 2013, at 13:34, "Danny O'Brien" <danny at spesh.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>> the problem is that a troll on a troll gets lost in translation.  The bunk beds were originally installed as a troll on noisebridge's sleeper problem, and now people don't realize it was a terrible joke, so they actually believe that noisebridge is a place for people to go to sleep.
> 
> (that isn't actually true -- I think they were a sincere attempt to narrow down a particular problem. I think they probably made things worse.)
> 
> d.
> 
>> 
>> what a terrible thing to do to a hackerspace in the mission.
>> 
>> -jake
>> 
>> 
>> Eric W. Rasmussen wrote:
>> 
>> I was being sarcastic.
>> 
>> On 07/10/2013 02:13 AM, Robert Picone wrote:
>>> Isn't part of the point for them to be visible?  As I understand it,
>>> one of the biggest issues with sleeping at noisebridge was people
>>> slipping somewhere out of sight to actually use as a bedroom rather
>>> than a place to drowse off temporarily, knowing they'll be wakened soon.
>>> 
>>> If someone is snoring particularly noticeably in the stackers and not
>>> actively hacking as they do so, I don't see any reason why you
>>> shouldn't wake them and explain that they're making it harder to work,
>>> and that they should try to avoid sleeping at the space anyway.  You
>>> should treat it like you'd treat anyone else that was being loud
>>> without doing any actual hacking.
>>> 
>>> Only if you actually see wires sticking out of their head, or some
>>> sort of hacked apnea-abating device plugged into their face should you
>>> really feel any obligation to actually let them sleep if it's 
>> disruptive.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Eric W. Rasmussen <ewr at majortek.com
>>> <mailto:ewr at majortek.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>     If the beds were in a separate lab room, I wouldn't have a
>>>     problem. But the beds are in the middle of the space and it forces
>>>     other members to endure snoring and the such.
>>> 
>>>     Why don't you substitute the "Photo Lab" for the "Nuerosky Lab"?
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130711/bf45f976/attachment-0003.html>