[Noisebridge-discuss] [SPAM] Re: Close noisebridge, to fix noisebridge

[Dan Cote]

Yes. Does anyone need to raise any topics who can't be there in person?
On Jun 1, 2013 10:10 AM, "LinkReincarnate" <linkreincarnate at gmail.com>
wrote:

> So can we agree that this needs to go on the agenda for the next meeting
> then?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Carlos Ivan Sosa <gnusosa at gnusosa.net>wrote:
>
>> Danny,
>>
>> Are we still writing RFC per action or modification of the structure
>> of the space?
>>
>> I say reboot the god damn thing, and don't care about the tone of the
>> expression of this actions. So reboot it, close it, deny access, and
>> alter the precious space that everybody loves.
>>
>> It's all for the greater good of the space.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> www.linkreincarnate.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130601/2bead215/attachment-0003.html>