[Noisebridge-discuss] Get the F Out!

[Gopiballava Flaherty]

On Mar 14, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> don't forget that the fires in towers 1 and 2 burned for only for about an hour, and

Don't forget that there was structural damage and flammable liquid added, which weren't present in the other building fires.

> building 7 burned for maybe 8 hours but kindof a small pathetic fire.

Can you clarify what you mean by "small pathetic fire"? The photos here make that characterization sound inaccurate:
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html

> these were some big skyscraper fires (no collapses though):
> 
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

Six fires, none of which had physical damage to the building at the onset of them. WTC7 was hit by debris:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf8wR9PQSPc

There was enough debris around WTC7 that emergency services had trouble getting in to the building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wieK2a_d-8s

So in terms of core facts:
a) The buildings did not collapse into their own footprints as you claimed
b) The fire in WTC7 was not small or pathetic by any rational definition; smoke was billowing out every floor

I suspect that you probably have numerous other reasons that you're convinced that the official story is wrong. Before you start enumerating those, please ask yourself: When you *start* with inaccuracies, why would you expect people to keep listening? When I see a report and follow the first citation, and find it misrepresents the source, I stop reading. Not worth the time.

Thanks,

gopi.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130314/b2372765/attachment.bin>