[Noisebridge-discuss] Get the F Out!

[Dean Mao]

We believe anything because our water has been fluorinated.  Nazis used
fluorination to keep people submissive to those in power.  This is how cats
control us.

Thanks Obama!



On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:

> god, you people will believe anything.
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Martin Bogomolni wrote:
>
>  Leaving this link here.  http://www.debunking911.com/**firsttime.htm<http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm>
>>
>> *sigh*
>>
>> -M
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>
>>> large and barely controlled fires - those have happened in skyscrapers
>>> around the world and NEVER resulted in even a partial collapse.  But you
>>> said "more plausible," so i guess i can't argue with that.
>>>
>>> don't forget that the fires in towers 1 and 2 burned for only for about
>>> an
>>> hour, and building 7 burned for maybe 8 hours but kindof a small pathetic
>>> fire.
>>>
>>> these were some big skyscraper fires (no collapses though):
>>>
>>> http://911research.wtc7.net/**wtc/analysis/compare/fires.**html<http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html>
>>>
>>>  One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that
>>> suffered
>>>  a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the 22nd floor
>>>  and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an estimated
>>>  $100 million in direct property loss. 1   2   3   It was later described
>>>  by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant fire in this
>>> century".
>>>
>>>  The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of
>>>  spandrel panel connections. 4   Despite the severity and duration of the
>>>  fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the
>>>  building collapsed.
>>>
>>> Gopiballava Flaherty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>  hopefully nobody on this list thinks that three steel skyscraper can
>>>> just
>>>> all collapse into their own footprints, because two of them were hit
>>>> with
>>>> planes.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think that what you describe would be unlikely, yes.
>>>
>>> However, large and barely controlled fires followed by collapses that
>>> went
>>> outside the buildings footprints - which is a more accurate description
>>> of
>>> 9/11 - are somewhat more plausible.
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.**noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/**mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-**discuss<https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>>>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.**noisebridge.net<Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/**mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-**discuss<https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>



-- 
Dean Mao
dean.mao at hackerdojo.com
Come visit us, we love new people!
www.hackerdojo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130314/358173c8/attachment.html>