[Noisebridge-discuss] Too many kittens for broadband

nicolas weidinger dr.weidinger at gmail.com
Sat Mar 23 02:56:45 UTC 2013

This is a wonderful idea, but censoring kittens because just because the
user doesn't have the right technology seems wrong. What we're looking for
is delivering so many kittens that the only way anyone could possibly see
all of them is with a gigabit connection. Do you have any advice on
crashing browsers?

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:44 PM, nicolas weidinger
<dr.weidinger at gmail.com>wrote:

> http://i.imgur.com/hePQTrE.jpg
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:06 PM, nicolas weidinger
>> <dr.weidinger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > what do you mean this wont work!?
>> Oh, I don't mean to say that wont work at all. I'm a big proponent of
>> Gigabit applications!
>> I just think about how to _prevent_ crashing browsers most of the
>> time, so my ears perked up reading the "crash the browser" part.
>> How about very nice full-screen HD videos of adorable kittens, and
>> never serve them at slower speeds, or intentionally add jitter and
>> delay if the streams are too slow.
>> Denying viewers adorable kittens unless they have gigabit Ethernet.
>> People will be out in the street with torches, demanding fiber, I tell
>> you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130322/d578fd8b/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list