[Noisebridge-discuss] Just wanted to share this... (Weev)

[Socrates Wilde]

No. And even if it was, then the law itself would be illegal -- as 90% of
them are now anyway.


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Matt Thrailkill <matt at thrailkill.org>wrote:

> Is it illegal to be a troll?
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Garrett Mace <garrettmace at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:39 PM, "Robert \"Finny\" Merrill" <
> rfmerrill at berkeley.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> For real the case is all kinds of fucked up. If anything it's an
> >> obvious power move by AT&T--"we are above the law, here let us show
> >> you how above the law we are"
> >
> > "...by working entirely within the law."
> >
> > The fact is that pointing fingers at one thing, doesn't mean everything
> else is not part of the problem...overeager prosecutors, ambiguous laws,
> weev being an annoying idiot, and AT$T's maudlin lawyers. Maybe if any one
> of those factors were missing, weev would be a free, racist, idiot. But the
> lack of consistent and straightforward case law in these incidents means
> that if you touch an IP address in a questionably appropriate way, you
> could become a security hero, go to FPMITA prison, or anything in between.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 

         *"**War is the health of the State."** *

*—Randolph Bourne*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130322/ab69e485/attachment-0001.html>