[Noisebridge-discuss] Meeting Notes 2013 11 12 - slightly abridged
spinach.williams at gmail.com
Thu Nov 14 16:57:40 UTC 2013
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Frantisek Apfelbeck <algoldor at yahoo.com>wrote:
> A. "As a result of our prior conversation, we collectively propose: If a
> member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members
> to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of
> >>> This is extremely radical step, I really wonder what is the threat of
> unidentified members (on hiatus or active) to the Noisebridge community.
> Why the people should be identified, why the deadlines? Explain please. It
> would be very reasonable to get at least in touch with the members letting
> them know that the things are changing, but I do not see this written
lol, it's a coup. the gentrification of the mission metastasizing the
bridge itself, and anyone who speaks up without a so-called solution (the
oft-cited solution "just stop" is summarily dismissed) is branded
"negative" and never listened to again. it's sharp, even if unintentional.
there goes years of accumulated tools, books, knowledge, community goodwill
etc. into the hands of dudes who just got here. gonna let it keep happening?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss