[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals

[jim]

On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 03:44 -0800, spinach williams wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>         
>             Corrected again. I had thought anarchy referred
>         to a community organization without formal rules,
>         that "anarchists love rules; they just don't
>         love rulers."
> that's an oversimplification if ever there was one
> JS: but off the mark? 
>  
>             Y'all certainly have gotten excited about sexual
>         harassment issues.
> naturally, people would be quite excited to finally be treated like
> human beings within a community of their peers. it's kinda nice,
> pretty excellent to be met with the basic level of decency men hold
> for those they consider people. definitely something to get excited
> about. 
JS: certainly! I agree, always have.