[Noisebridge-discuss] anti-anonymity proposals
jim
jim at systemateka.com
Sun Nov 17 22:32:45 UTC 2013
Great start, and thank you!
I don't think I suggested not reporting, just
not reporting to a formal authority.
Why is this about women only, and why is my
opinion not welcome--after all, that's all I'm
doing, presenting my point of view. Do you think
that seeing one's self as a victim is okay?
Why do you say I'm ignoring anyone's experiences?
I have no idea what others feel and have not so
claimed. I am certainly open to listening and
considering, as I think is obvious by my replies
in this email thread.
It's dis-empowering to be harassed if you let
it be.
Who has blocked banishment in the face of
several women's testimonies? I believe not I,
though I certainly dislike the process of
banishment as well as the entire fuss. That said,
I've made none of the claims you suggest.
I dislike the trend to any policies other
than treat each other excellently. Why is my
opinion not welcome in the group?
You're right that to report any problems
to disbelief is dis-empowering, certainly
discouraging. But in such a case, shouldn't one
take courage and fight back? I think so.
Bystanders intervening is right. I never
suggested otherwise--are you suggesting I have?
I have not claimed to know better than
anyone else; do not accuse me of things I have
not said or done, that's offensive (but not
dis-empowering to me--I refuse to accept that
false criticism, and I'm fighting back)!
I've read your email and thought about what
you've said. I am defending my right to express
my opinions about life and feelings, and others
have a right to take them or leave them as they
choose. I am not dictating or telling anyone
anything. Why do you think I am? I hope you'll
answer that question.
Of course you know your own feelings better
than I: you've told me little of your own
experiences. I can only know your lived experience
if you share it with me; if you wish not to, don't
blame me for expressing my point of view, especially
one that I mean in kindness.
My choice is to defend my right to express my
point of view as well as to listen and think about
whatever you have to say, and I believe I've
repeatedly demonstrated that.
Again, I thank you for taking the time to
reply--sincerely.
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 13:56 -0800, Hannah Grimm wrote:
> Jim, you're still defending the statement "it's dis-empowering to
> perceive one's self as a victim and turn to a community for support."
> You even defend this statement with a notation saying "# 7. I mean
> this", so it's clear at this point that there is no misunderstanding
> going on. Let me explain why people are mad: you do not get to tell
> women what is or is not empowering. If women say that having an
> anti-harassment policy and a community that comes to their defense
> when they report harassment is empowering, then you need to listen to
> what these women are saying. Ignoring the statements and experiences
> of women and telling them that you know what they feel better than
> they do is the very definition of mansplaining sexist bullshit.
>
>
> It is disempowering to be harassed. It is disempowering when you
> report harassment only to find that they do not believe you. It is
> disempowering to try to remove an abuser from the community only to
> find that your efforts are blocked by an individual who refuses to
> kick someone out without absolute proof (oh, and the testimonies of
> multiple women apparently don't count).
>
>
> That's disempowering.
>
>
> Here are things that are empowering: having an anti-harassment policy,
> being taken seriously, bystanders intervening to tell people that
> their actions are NOT OKAY when they grab your ass, banning people who
> have a history of battering or stalking women, hearing everyone tell
> people on NB discuss who say sexist bullshit that they are wrong and
> need to shut up.
>
>
> That's empowering!
>
>
> This is my lived experience, as a woman, for things which are and are
> not empowering. Now here are your options: you can listen to my
> experiences and recognize that I know my own feelings better than you
> do, OR you can continue to defend this statement and thereby claim
> that you know what women feel better than they do.
>
>
> Your choice.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>
>
> What snarky comment about people being excited...?
> The sincere reply I made below her paragraph?
> I did not intend snarky; I agree.
>
>
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 11:48 -0800, spinach williams wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:43 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 03:44 -0800, spinach williams
> wrote:
> > > that's an oversimplification if ever there was one
> >
> > > JS: but off the mark?
> >
> > yes.
> >
> > > naturally, people would be quite excited to
> finally be
> > treated like
> > > human beings within a community of their peers.
> it's kinda
> > nice,
> > > pretty excellent to be met with the basic level of
> decency
> > men hold
> > > for those they consider people. definitely
> something to get
> > excited
> > > about.
> >
> > JS: certainly! I agree, always have.
> > then why the snarky comment about people getting excited
> over it?
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list