[Noisebridge-discuss] FWD: anti-jim and anti-anons2.0

[Adrian Chadd]

On Nov 17, 2013 8:52 PM, "Hannah Grimm" <dharlette at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey, here's an idea: maybe if you say something, and suddenly everyone
starts yelling at you, it is because you are wrong and your ideas are
actively harmful to others.
>

Not true, as a general rule. See: all of the social change in the last 200
years.

Don't start down the path of righteousness through numbers.

Adrian

>
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:44 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Poor defenseless jim has learned a fair
>> amount from this s-storm, and for that I'm
>> glad, if somewhat exhausted. I certainly
>> made some bad mistakes.
>>     "shitlist du jour" may fill a regular
>> need for a scapegoat.
>>     One alarming revelation is about the
>> hostility some females bear toward males.
>> Males certainly bear blame and shame, but
>> how to reconcile to trust and well-being?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 17:29 -0800, Dayton Grant wrote:
>> > just Fwd'ing this from someone who insists on remaining anonymous:
>> >
>> > starting line
>> > > > can keep doing YOUR OWN sorry ass fucking trolling
>> > > > bullshit, not ME!! And you can bet YOUR sweet ass
>> > > > that I'm not hanging MY neck out with comments &
>> > > > trapped answers or giving out MY Xname just so I get
>> > > > targeted for public condemnation just like jim
>> > > > still is (i.e., the group's shitlist du jour!!)
>> > > >
>> > > > Here's my tally of those definitely ganging up in 1
>> > > > form or another against poor, defenseless jim for
>> > > > his comments & opinions, as of sun morning
>> > > > - Ceren Ercen
>> > > > - Snail
>> > > > - rachel lyra hospodar
>> > > > - Danny O'Brien
>> > > > - Leif Ryge
>> > > > - Hannah Grimm
>> > > > - Rachel McConnell
>> > > > - Tom Lowenthal
>> > > > - Liz Henry
>> > > > ...
>> > > > I count jim getting outnumbered 9+:1
>> > > >
>> > > > jim shoulda quit while mayB he was ahead;
>> > > > 'pologies sure not gonna help at this pt
>> > > > I mean like maybe they'll try BANNING jim for his
>> > > > opinions during their next meeting or what??
>> > > > WTF with this shit???!!!
>> > > > Next up R other wannabes ready2join the anti-jim gang....
>> > finishline
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131117/ab4cde4d/attachment.html>