[Noisebridge-discuss] FWD: anti-jim and anti-anons2.0

[jim]

    Oh, also, note that the commotion around 
a few of my toxic ideas ignored most of the 
ideas I was trying to express. Not that it 
matters in my case, but you might be mindful 
in cases of others who might be at least 
somewhat good and not wonderfully horrid. 


On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 08:17 -0800, jim wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 20:52 -0800, Hannah Grimm wrote:
> > Hey, here's an idea: maybe if you say something, and suddenly everyone
> > starts yelling at you, it is because you are wrong and your ideas are
> > actively harmful to others.
> 
> JS: good idea. Seems I have, if you actually 
> read every tedious word of the threads, though 
> with difficulty because of the emotional noise 
> and seeming misrepresentations of what my 
> thoughts. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:44 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
> >         
> >             Poor defenseless jim has learned a fair
> >         amount from this s-storm, and for that I'm
> >         glad, if somewhat exhausted. I certainly
> >         made some bad mistakes.
> >             "shitlist du jour" may fill a regular
> >         need for a scapegoat.
> >             One alarming revelation is about the
> >         hostility some females bear toward males.
> >         Males certainly bear blame and shame, but
> >         how to reconcile to trust and well-being?
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 17:29 -0800, Dayton Grant wrote:
> >         > just Fwd'ing this from someone who insists on remaining
> >         anonymous:
> >         >
> >         > starting line
> >         > > > can keep doing YOUR OWN sorry ass fucking trolling
> >         > > > bullshit, not ME!! And you can bet YOUR sweet ass
> >         > > > that I'm not hanging MY neck out with comments &
> >         > > > trapped answers or giving out MY Xname just so I get
> >         > > > targeted for public condemnation just like jim
> >         > > > still is (i.e., the group's shitlist du jour!!)
> >         > > >
> >         > > > Here's my tally of those definitely ganging up in 1
> >         > > > form or another against poor, defenseless jim for
> >         > > > his comments & opinions, as of sun morning
> >         > > > - Ceren Ercen
> >         > > > - Snail
> >         > > > - rachel lyra hospodar
> >         > > > - Danny O'Brien
> >         > > > - Leif Ryge
> >         > > > - Hannah Grimm
> >         > > > - Rachel McConnell
> >         > > > - Tom Lowenthal
> >         > > > - Liz Henry
> >         > > > ...
> >         > > > I count jim getting outnumbered 9+:1
> >         > > >
> >         > > > jim shoulda quit while mayB he was ahead;
> >         > > > 'pologies sure not gonna help at this pt
> >         > > > I mean like maybe they'll try BANNING jim for his
> >         > > > opinions during their next meeting or what??
> >         > > > WTF with this shit???!!!
> >         > > > Next up R other wannabes ready2join the anti-jim
> >         gang....
> >         > finishline
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >         > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >         >
> >         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >         
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >         
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss