[Noisebridge-discuss] Information needed for our LPFM filing.
Norman Bradley
pryankster at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 06:47:02 UTC 2013
The norman at ix.netcom.comis probably the safest. Thanks.
You are entitled to your own opinion.
You are NOT entitled to your own facts.
Norman
On 11/3/2013 10:16 PM, Alexandra Glowaski wrote:
> Heya! I've been out traveling, with no wifi and a phone on the fritz.
> I'll be happy to send you my info privately; while it may well become
> public as soon as anybody requests to see the document, I'd rather
> keep it off-list.
>
> cheers,
> merlin.
>
> On Saturday, November 2, 2013, Noisebridge Radio
> <noisebridgeradio at gmail.com <mailto:noisebridgeradio at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Today is November Second and the filing deadline is the morning of
> the Fourteenth. I still haven't heard from any of the Officers or
> Board Members. If any are nervious about Google reading your mail,bh
> understandable, please use my private email norman at ix.netcom.com
> <mailto:norman at ix.netcom.com>
> > If the lack of responses is so the project will die please show the
> people that have worked on this project some respect and state so.
> Keep in mind that unless all of the parties respond I won't file for
> the license. I just don't like the idea of lying to the federal
> government.
> > I have appended the original note.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Noisebridge Radio
> <noisebridgeradio at gmail.com <mailto:noisebridgeradio at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > There seems that there is concern that I may be doing something
> nefarious and secret so here is the information needed and why. I need
> the information ASAP so I can submit our application. These are from
> FCC Form 318. [http://transition.fcc.gov/Forms/Form318/318.pdf]
> > The, legal name, residence address, citizenship, and position, of
> the board members and officers (#3 below). I need the answers to the
> questions listed below. I don't need details for 6 through 9 and only
> need information for #5 if the answer is no. Some of these answers are
> a bit touchy so please respond privately to this address or find me at
> the Tuesday meeting. All answers except #3 will be kept confidential.
> #3 needs to go on the form when submitted.
> > 3. Parties to the Application.
> > a. List separately each party to the application including, as
> applicable, the applicant, its officers, directors, five percent or
> greater stockholders, non-insulated partners, members, and all other
> persons and entities with attributable interests. If a corporation or
> partnership holds an attributable interest in the applicant, list
> separately, as applicable, its officers, directors, five percent or
> greater stockholders, non-insulated partners, and board members.
> Create a separate row for each individual or entity. Attach additional
> pages if necessary.
> > 5. Ownership.
> > a. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the
> application comply with the multiple ownership limits set forth in
> Section 73.855 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. Section
> 73.855.
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2003-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2003-title47-vol4-sec73-858.pdf]
> > b. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the
> application comply with the cross-ownership limits set forth in
> Section 73.860 of the Commission's rules. See 47 C.F.R. Section
> 73.860.
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title47-vol4/pdf/CFR-2012-title47-vol4-sec73-860.pdf]
> > c. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the
> application comply with the Commission's policies relating to media
> interests of immediate family members; and
> > d. Applicant certifies that it and all parties to the
> application comply with the Commission's policies relating to investor
> insulation and the non-participation of non-party investors or creditors.
> > 6. Character Issues. The applicant certifies that neither the
> applicant nor any party to the application has or has had any interest
> in, or connection with:
> > a. any broadcast application in any proceeding where character
> issues were left unresolved or were resolved adversely against the
> applicant or party to the application; or
> > b. any pending broadcast application in which character issues
> have been raised. Adverse Findings. The applicant certifies that no
> adverse finding has been made and no adverse final action has been
> taken by any court or administrative body as to the applicant, any
> party to this application, or any non-party equity owner in the
> applicant, in a civil or criminal proceeding brought under the
> provisions of any law related to the following: any felony; mass media
> related antitrust or unfair competition; fraudulent statements to
> another governmental unit; or discrimination?
> > 8. Unlicensed Operation. The applicant certifies, under penalty of
> perjury, that neither the applicant nor any party to the application
> has engaged in any manner, individually or with other persons, groups,
> organizations, or other entities, in the unlicensed operation of any
> station in violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934,
> as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 301.
> [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title47/pdf/USCODE-2011-title47-chap5-subchapIII-partI-sec301.pdf]
> > 9. Anti-Drug Abuse Act Certification. Applicant certifies that
> neither the applicant nor any party to the application is subject to
> denial of federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug
> Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Sectivgfv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131103/b5ae211a/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list