[Noisebridge-discuss] FWD: anti-jim and anti-anons2.0
jim
jim at systemateka.com
Mon Nov 18 16:17:39 UTC 2013
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 20:52 -0800, Hannah Grimm wrote:
> Hey, here's an idea: maybe if you say something, and suddenly everyone
> starts yelling at you, it is because you are wrong and your ideas are
> actively harmful to others.
JS: good idea. Seems I have, if you actually
read every tedious word of the threads, though
with difficulty because of the emotional noise
and seeming misrepresentations of what my
thoughts.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:44 PM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>
> Poor defenseless jim has learned a fair
> amount from this s-storm, and for that I'm
> glad, if somewhat exhausted. I certainly
> made some bad mistakes.
> "shitlist du jour" may fill a regular
> need for a scapegoat.
> One alarming revelation is about the
> hostility some females bear toward males.
> Males certainly bear blame and shame, but
> how to reconcile to trust and well-being?
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 17:29 -0800, Dayton Grant wrote:
> > just Fwd'ing this from someone who insists on remaining
> anonymous:
> >
> > starting line
> > > > can keep doing YOUR OWN sorry ass fucking trolling
> > > > bullshit, not ME!! And you can bet YOUR sweet ass
> > > > that I'm not hanging MY neck out with comments &
> > > > trapped answers or giving out MY Xname just so I get
> > > > targeted for public condemnation just like jim
> > > > still is (i.e., the group's shitlist du jour!!)
> > > >
> > > > Here's my tally of those definitely ganging up in 1
> > > > form or another against poor, defenseless jim for
> > > > his comments & opinions, as of sun morning
> > > > - Ceren Ercen
> > > > - Snail
> > > > - rachel lyra hospodar
> > > > - Danny O'Brien
> > > > - Leif Ryge
> > > > - Hannah Grimm
> > > > - Rachel McConnell
> > > > - Tom Lowenthal
> > > > - Liz Henry
> > > > ...
> > > > I count jim getting outnumbered 9+:1
> > > >
> > > > jim shoulda quit while mayB he was ahead;
> > > > 'pologies sure not gonna help at this pt
> > > > I mean like maybe they'll try BANNING jim for his
> > > > opinions during their next meeting or what??
> > > > WTF with this shit???!!!
> > > > Next up R other wannabes ready2join the anti-jim
> gang....
> > finishline
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list