[Noisebridge-discuss] Is there a vote tonight on keeping Noisebridge open?
arrays.tostring at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 21:47:11 UTC 2013
If NB has no lease at 2169, would it have to move?
Where would NB move?
How would NB exist without 2169?
Is this an attempt to make NB move somewhere else?
I don't get it.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:21 PM, jarrod hicks <hicksu at gmail.com> wrote:
> SuperQ's proposal was presented by Michael.
> "Noisebridge should not renew our lease when it expires."
> The proposal did not get too much time for discussion. Also this is my
> recollection. I hope I am not mis-representing anyone.
> The proposal is to new renew Noisebridge's lease of the current space at
> 2169 Mission st. There were some questions about if this is a proposal to
> move Noisebridge, and why this is being proposed. Micheal made it clear
> that this proposal does not include any other plans beyond what is said in
> the language of the proposal. J.C. stated that he would block this. Tom
> suggested that the proposal be modified to say that Noisebridge should also
> seek to get out of the lease prior to its expiration, which Michael agreed
> Based on this conversation I adjusted the language to:
> "Noisebridge should not renew our lease when it expires. Noisebridge
> should also seek to exit the lease as soon as possible."
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Liz Henry <lizhenry at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I heard that someone proposed last week to not renew our lease. Did that
>> actually happen, and it is up for consensus tonight? I'd like for
>> everyone to be clear on that.
>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>> Liz Henry
>> lhenry at mozilla.com
>> lizhenry at gmail.com
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss