[Noisebridge-discuss] The legalities.

Will Sargent will.sargent at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 04:37:41 UTC 2014


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Norman Bradley <pryankster at gmail.com> wrote:

> It has been mentioned several times that people living at NB violates our
> lease. It is actually a bit more complicated. After looking up how 2169
> Mission is zoned. I found that it is not zoned for residential. A place to
> start looking is at http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=2771#
> findzoning . That is the San Francisco Planning Department and you can
> find a list of changes, permits, and even how much things cost. Our place
> "Appears eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical
> Resources."
> I am NOT a lawyer so this is just a guess after looking at the online
> records. I think that what they say is that floor 1 is zoned for food sales
> and floors 2 and 3 are light industrial. To allow sleeping / living in the
> space will at least require new permits from the, Planning Dept., Fire
> Dept., and Health Dept. as well as convincing the landlord.
> I'm not sure how long flogging this issue will continue, but, in my
> opinion it is not up for debate. It is spelled out in both zoning law and
> our lease. Our object should be how do we stop it not how much should we
> allow.
> You are entitled to your own opinion.
> You are NOT entitled to your own facts.
> Norman
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140403/d233a41d/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list