[Noisebridge-discuss] Google Glass thoughts

Jeffrey Carl Faden jeffreyatw at gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 21:30:43 UTC 2014

This reasonable, rational approach is not nearly counter-culture enough for
my tastes.

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 15 April 2014 14:11, Norman Bradley <pryankster at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would say, bring your Google glass along and we will find ways to make
> > make it not work.
> >
> > Let us start with transmission. I am sure that we can F##k that up and
> > insert other things. Oh as for "recording" stuff. We shall see won't we?
> > Unless it is actually plugged in we have an entrance.
> >
> > I am guessing that this transmits on the "Bluetooth" frequencies. Those
> are
> > available to everyone for free with no license required.
> >
> > Just one hacker's opinion.
> .. doing that will also mess up other people's legitimate use of
> bluetooth. And wifi is also on the same frequency ranges, so a jammer
> would also screw up legitimate day to day use of the 2GHz wifi at the
> space.
> You know, you could always take an alternate approach. If someone is
> recording, ask them to stop. Same as if I am wandering around with a
> phone or camera pointed out at the space.
> -a
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140415/0e76b7c7/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list