[Noisebridge-discuss] Broken Stove
davidfine
d at vidfine.com
Mon Apr 21 22:50:41 UTC 2014
Not me. I said I'd be assessing the state of the kitchen for one week
starting today, and that if it was a hazard on average, it would be
fixed with a sledge hammer. I was cautiously optimistic to hear that
people were working on cleaning it up. Also, a sledge hammer would have
made a much bigger hole.
--D
On 4/21/14, 7:48 AM, Jeffrey Carl Faden wrote:
> By the way, this looks like it's possibly the work of davidfine.
> https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2014-April/044036.html
>
> Jeffrey
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Jeffrey Carl Faden
> <jeffreyatw at gmail.com <mailto:jeffreyatw at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Don't feel too bad, Ronald. No one should be depending on the
> stove, and if it's unsafe to use, it shouldn't be used. I think
> you did the right thing considering the risks. I just hope no one
> goes through the trouble to undo your work and bring it back
> online without making the proper repairs or replacements first.
>
> Jeffrey
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com
> <mailto:setient at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Just got off the phone regarding the stove with a community
> member who uses the stove. I had originally decided to not do
> anything other than say maybe we should just use half the
> stove. Then I took a closer look and said NOPE that isn't a
> good idea to leave this running. I then disabled it. It was
> a much longer than necessary conversation. This person also
> knew of the issues at least on saturday and did nothing to
> resolve it (fix it, disable it, call someone). I think we
> need to spend some more time with the community and teaching
> the community standards of Doocracy and be excellent. I was a
> little un excellent in handling this situation. I need to
> work on that.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Ronald Cotoni
> <setient at gmail.com <mailto:setient at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Also please be aware, if you do not agree with my
> assessment, you can doocratically hook up the stove again.
> I would really hate to see someone get injured or
> anything else bad to happen in the space.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Ronald Cotoni
> <setient at gmail.com <mailto:setient at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> The removal portion of it was not really related to
> this email. It was more informing that I
> doocratically disabled it, due to the hazard of using
> it. What we choose to do can be decided at Tuesday's
> meeting.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:44 PM, John Ellis
> <neurofog at gmail.com <mailto:neurofog at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ronald,
>
> Not doubting that.
>
> I was simply stating what I understood from the
> inspector, as I spoke to him directly during his
> visit. I'm trying to minimize misspent effort on
> repairing something that will almost certainly
> have to be removed.
>
> -John
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Ronald Cotoni
> <setient at gmail.com <mailto:setient at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Sorry that was snarky. What I mean to say is
> that when a conductive liquid hits wires (in
> this case a heating element with lots of power
> running through it), it can cause a short.
> Ditto with the control circuit. Even if
> somewhere was to not get hurt by electrocution
> or a fire being started, it could damage the
> stove further. Is that excellent to the users
> of the stove?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Ronald Cotoni
> <setient at gmail.com <mailto:setient at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Did you look at the picture?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM, John
> Ellis <neurofog at gmail.com
> <mailto:neurofog at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ronald,
>
> I thought the inspector said the
> cook-top had to go.
>
> -John
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM,
> Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com
> <mailto:setient at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It would appear that the tempered
> glass on top of the stove has been
> broken. The way in which it is
> broken means liquids can easily
> get to the heating element and the
> circuit board that controls the
> stove. We will either need to
> replace the top glass with a new
> one, get a different stove or take
> it out altogether. In the short
> term, I have disabled the circuit
> breaker, put up a few signs with
> my phone number and finally Sid
> made it so that the stove can't
> just be turned on by flipping the
> circuit breaker. This is a pretty
> major safety hazard right now and
> we should deal with this along
> with the building inspector stuff
> post haste.
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ronald Cotoni
> Systems Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140421/61f2f619/attachment.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list