[Noisebridge-discuss] The legalities.

[B Perez]

Hear hear! +1

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 3, 2014, at 8:52 PM, Norman Bradley <pryankster at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It has been mentioned several times that people living at NB violates our lease. It is actually a bit more complicated. After looking up how 2169 Mission is zoned. I found that it is not zoned for residential. A place to start looking is at http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=2771#findzoning . That is the San Francisco Planning Department and you can find a list of changes, permits, and even how much things cost. Our place "Appears eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources."
> 
> I am NOT a lawyer so this is just a guess after looking at the online records. I think that what they say is that floor 1 is zoned for food sales and floors 2 and 3 are light industrial. To allow sleeping / living in the space will at least require new permits from the, Planning Dept., Fire Dept., and Health Dept. as well as convincing the landlord.
> 
> I'm not sure how long flogging this issue will continue, but, in my opinion it is not up for debate. It is spelled out in both zoning law and our lease. Our object should be how do we stop it not how much should we allow.
> 
> You are entitled to your own opinion.
> You are NOT entitled to your own facts.
> 
> Norman
> 
>