[Noisebridge-discuss] concensus

[Ryan Pepin]

Any more +1's and we'll be approaching concensus here, although certainly
not unanimity.
On Feb 26, 2014 9:44 PM, "Ronald Cotoni" <setient at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
> On Feb 26, 2014 5:48 PM, "spinach williams" <spinach.williams at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 26, 2014 5:43 PM, "Naomi Most" <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > You seem to think "time to consensus" is a cost variable best minimized.
>> >
>> > I'll give you a hint: it's not.
>> sooo +1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140226/2fc30bb1/attachment.html>