[Noisebridge-discuss] "Banning" discussion tonight

[Ronald Cotoni]

I am sorry he was not present at that meeting.   I dont know you but there
are plenty of other members who could have proxy blocked. Even me.   I do
not remember hearing from you. Please submit a new consensus item so we can
discuss it.   While I cannot attend tonights meeting perhaps we could work
out a gchat hangout so you could be present at a future meeting even if
this doesn't work out.  Let's be a bit creative with "attending" a meeting.
On Feb 25, 2014 6:18 PM, "Lee Sonko" <lee at lee.org> wrote:

> MCT agreed to proxy-block for me several weeks ago. He was at the meeting
> 2 weeks ago when the matter was expected to be discussed, however it wasn't
> brought up. Last week MCT wasn't at the meeting so I had no representation.
>
> I work Tuesday evenings so am generally unable to attend meetings but I
> found a substitute tonight.
>
> I hope we can all discuss this matter together.
>
> Lee
> On Feb 25, 2014 6:07 PM, "Ronald Cotoni" <setient at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lee was aware and Lee chose for a long time to not come to meetings or
>> get someone else to proxy block.  I suggest you get a deeper understanding
>> of how consensus works and why it is the way it is.   It was to give him
>> time, which he ignored sadly and has to deal with the consequences now.
>> On Feb 25, 2014 6:00 PM, "Charles Tang" <cjtang1 at asu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> The second person who answers by come to a meeting.
>>>
>>> These answers are fluid, which is the reason why Johnny asked for
>>> clarification on GitHub.
>>>
>>> We need a better understanding and conceptualizer for banning.
>>>
>>> I made my case with Lee. It seems to me he was just being annoying to
>>> Tom. Now, others do annoying things to me all the time, but I don't exclude.
>>>
>>> The problem here is a failure to communicate, to ask, to "participate",
>>> to educate and to help.
>>>
>>> Indeed, the community is fractured. Indeed, people can be annoying
>>> Indeed, people can do bad things.
>>>
>>> But, goodness is fragile. Moreover, exclusion is not the answer for our
>>> problems. Inquisitions to rid ourselves of alternatives forecloses
>>> opportunity for us all.
>>>
>>> And movements fail. . . .
>>> --
>>> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Ronald Cotoni <setient at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Come to a meeting.  Read the bylaws and look at the wiki.  These
>>>> questions can be answered by those things
>>>> On Feb 25, 2014 5:47 PM, "Charles Tang" <cjtang1 at asu.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is active member defined be the label "member" or is it define by
>>>>> those who are "active."
>>>>>
>>>>> Or is there really a mythical "active member"
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25 February 2014 17:42, Darius Garza <313kid at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > "A ban from the Noisebridge space may be a useful social punishment
>>>>>> for a
>>>>>> > social crime"
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Noisebridge is a lot of things, but it certainly isn't up to anyone
>>>>>> to use
>>>>>> > it as a "social punishment" tool.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... noisebridge is apparently whatever the active membership decide
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> is. I thought that was the point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -a
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140225/4807a938/attachment-0003.html>