[Noisebridge-discuss] Feminist Book Club For Men: tomorrow 7pm was: The Nuclear Option
lee at lee.org
Wed Jan 8 08:40:26 UTC 2014
Tom, if feminism is <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism> "the
belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities", and
you treat men like me with such undeserved disdain, then you don't seem to
be the best person to organize a feminist book club. If you recall, I
reached out to you in an unflaggingly positive manner multiple times in the
last 2 months to resolve an issue and got only non-responses in email (see
below) and "don't ever call me" on the telephone.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lee Sonko <lee at lee.org>
Date: Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] The Nuclear Option
To: Tom Lowenthal <me at tomlowenthal.com>
Tom, I didn't see any response from you concerning the issue below.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Lee Sonko <lee at lee.org> wrote:
> (sent just to Tom)
> I wish I had positive things to say about our interactions concerning NB
> and wiki admin rights. I know you commit a lot of energy to the space. I
> commit energy to it as well, not as much as you, but I think I understand
> the passion. Your non-responses were the worst. From my end, I can't figure
> out what is up and can only assume that you are an adversary to be gotten
> around. That isn't as productive or as fun as working together.
> I will keep trying to connect and I hope we can be on the same side,
> Have a great day and Happy Holidays,
> PS. I would interpret a non-response to this email, like the other
> non-responses, to be slightly hostile.
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Tom Lowenthal <me at tomlowenthal.com>wrote:
>> Lee Sonko <lee at lee.org> wrote:
>> > Tom, why did you remove my bureaucrat and administrator rights on the
>> > Noisebridge wiki and stop answering my emails?
>> Lee, I removed your admin privileges to stop you from continuing to
>> edit the protected page describing our membership process.
>> You edited the membership page, adding incorrect information, ignoring
>> the notice that the page should only be edited as the result of a
>> consensus discussion. When I rolled back your changes and asked you to
>> stop, you admitted that you weren't at the consensus discussion,
>> hadn't actually read any notes about it, and were just adding
>> information that you thought was similar to what had been discussed.
>> Then you edited the page again, so I removed your admin privileges.
>> Was it also you (IP 184.108.40.206) who edited the anti-harassment
>> policy page? Perhaps it was someone else. In any event, if
>> 220.127.116.11 is reading: the text on that page is *also* the result
>> of a consensus process, and should not be edited. In fact, the page
>> has a banner across the top letting readers know about the policy's
>> trial period, and how to contribute on Github, which is where we
>> agreed to work on changes.
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss