[Noisebridge-discuss] Consensus item

[Romy Snowyla]

I see some kind of racial issue here and we must argue endlessly over semantics through multiple threads 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 1, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Rachel McConnell <rachel at xtreme.com> wrote:
> 
> It was just a mis-placed hyphen.  I'm sure Al meant, "rat face-fucker" which I'm sure you agree is a superior insult to "pig fucker".
> 
> Rachel1.0
> 
>> On 1/1/14 3:30 PM, gardner at invulnerable.org wrote:
>> Danny,
>>   I agree. I much prefer the derisive term "pig fucker" over "rat-face
>> fucker." Are we not civilized?
>> 
>> -g
>> 
>>> On 2014-01-01 13:54, Danny O'Brien wrote:
>>> What was *that* all about?
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Gee, I hope the people at the meeting don't try some sneaky thing
>>>> like take
>>>> advantage of the fact that it is New Year's Eve and try to pass some
>>>> consensus items they know members would block.
>>>> 
>>>> But no one would do that, because only a rat-face fucker who doesn't
>>>> truly
>>>> care about the spirit of the consensus process would do that.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>