[Noisebridge-discuss] why would hackers come to noisebridge?
linkreincarnate at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 01:57:26 UTC 2014
Let me be clear. Noisebridge not being safe isn't what is preventing
people from coming. Dealing with bullshit like this from regular members
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:41 PM, LinkReincarnate
<linkreincarnate at gmail.com>wrote:
> When you stop avoiding questions whose answer is inconvenient to your
> argument yours will carry more weight. How does word choice and telling
> people how they should think relate to people being hurt in Noisebridge?
> Every instance of physical violence in the space has resulted in a quick
> banning for the offenders and has nothing to do with what I am talking
> about. This whole Noisebridge isn't safe chorus is bullshit. It has no
> bearing on reality and is more of a narrative by the group that want to
> shape the people in Noisebridge than a description what the space is like.
> Noisebridge is no more dangerous than taking the Bart. Or going to school.
> Or being in any public place with people.
> You are not the morality police and no one is obligated to follow your
> moral code. Whether you like it or not.
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:32 PM, spinach williams <
> spinach.williams at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 17, 2014 6:27 PM, "LinkReincarnate" <linkreincarnate at gmail.com>
>> > I return your comment back to you unaltered. What are you trying to do
>> when you tell people not to use certain words, other than hack society
>> starting with them?
>> reducing instances of people being physically hacked. when someone is
>> physically hurt by becoming more thoughtful, your argument will carry more
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss