[Noisebridge-discuss] modern sexism

Elizabeth Hubbard emhubbard28 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 18 05:02:38 UTC 2014

I guess we had a misunderstanding.  There was a big fuss over whether or
not men could even use the word a few months ago.  I was, back then,
offended for some legitimate but not very important reasons.  Everybody
lives a different life and thinks different things and misunderstandings
happen.  I did like all the lololols though.

I'd have responded the same way with the Thank Yous whether or not it's a
sarcastic meme.  A newsletter's a fucking great idea.  Thank you!

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Elizabeth Hubbard <emhubbard28 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thank you, Al Sweigart.  A lot of people at Noisebridge think the same
> thing and just don't do much foruming.  I don't really have a newsletter,
> though.  A google+.  A newsletter's a great idea for a writer though, so
> thank you for the idea and the compliment.
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Elizabeth Hubbard <emhubbard28 at gmail.com>wrote:
>> To write this as politely as possible, is it really polite for us to
>> philosophically segregate people and to tell them what they should be
>> calling themselves based on how they look (gender, body-type, race, etc)?
>>  Or to cyber-bully people for having a blip in their filter mechanism?  Or
>> to write words to people that we know will make them feel less human?  All
>> I'm looking forward to is a more polite forum.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140317/9629baa0/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list