[Noisebridge-discuss] [Drama] Fwd: [Noisebridge-announce] Important Noisebridge Procedural Changes

Madelynn Martiniere mmartiniere at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 08:46:34 UTC 2014

It is still my understanding that we followed the procedure we laid out 
in our first Board meeting 

1. As soon as the wording for the proposal had been finalized, it was 
posted to Github.
2. There was some discussion, issues raised, and items amended. Some of 
that discussion was on Github, and some of it happened to be on other 
3. 4/5 members of the board were in favor, thus passing the proposal
4. The information was then promptly shared with the Noisebridge community

I do agree that further discussion on the topic of how long a proposal 
should stay in discussion within the board is in order, given the 
surprising expediency of this motion. This is a conversation that the 
BoD is having internally.

> Naomi Most <mailto:naomi at nthmost.com>
> March 26, 2014 1:31 AM
> In other words: discussion happened between 80% of the board
> membership, and 20% of the board membership was left in the dark until
> roughly 9 hours ago.
> Good clarification.
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Madelynn Martiniere
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140326/69b764e9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20140326/69b764e9/attachment.jpg>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list