[Noisebridge-discuss] Rachel's language
alcides888 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 03:36:38 UTC 2014
Johny, I sincerely apologize if I made it seem like I was taking sides. I
wasn't trying to take sides and I was not trying to put you on the
I acknowledge that my message may not have been well-received by you and I
will try to better moderate any future compositions.
Again, I sincerely apologize.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
> ------ Original Message ------
> Whether or not a boundary is (made explicitly ) known BEFORE it has been
> crossed is irrelevant if honest reconciliation is the goal. When someone
> has stated AFTERWARDS that a boundary has been crossed, acknowledgement of
> the event is a fantastic first step to honest reconciliation.
> You're stating that, even though Rachel did not explicitly state
> her boundary in advance, she has a right to have unannounced boundaries. I
> agree. I have boundaries which i do not announce-- we all do.
> Here's where you're mistaken-- Rachel explicitly stated her boundary, and
> i conscientiously respect the boundary she explicitly stated.
> Feel free to continue discussing this amongst yourselves, I'm done with
> this particular thread.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss