[Noisebridge-discuss] on allowing anonymous editing on the wiki
johnyradio at gmail.com
Tue May 20 20:03:08 UTC 2014
I had no intention or desire to be condescending
Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>That's a gross mischaracterization of what happened.
>You took a comment that was designed to engage you in a specific
>discussion, cross-applied it to a discussion that was irrelevant, and
>then took a condescending tone about it on the mailing list, which
>wasn't even the original venue for the discussion.
>And, because you chose to re-loop in the NB list after I took this
>discussion "offline", I'm not going to bother trying to protect your
>reputation, as you complained about the LAST time I publicly declared
>I was going to stop replying to you on the list.
>So, you get your wish, Johny: I will no longer seek to engage you ANY
>online dialog, despite my wanting to give you a chance.
>On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Naomi Most <pnaomi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Because I'm not interested in hashing things out with you on email,
>> dude. I am being deliberately avoidant due to painful past
>> Jr: then I kindly suggest you stop posting public messages referring to me, like this one yesterday on slack. It's not fair to message me and then complain when I respond:
>> nthmost [12:02 PM] This is the thing @johnyradio doesn't get. @johnyradio: you should read this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem
>Naomi Theora Most
>naomi at nthmost.com
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss