[Noisebridge-discuss] [Noisebridge-announce] Noisebridge Statement on Jacob Appelbaum

[Andrey Fedorov]

Still, public due process: good. Secret proceedings for banning people: bad.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Andrey Fedorov <me at anfedorov.com> wrote:

> Probably:
>
>   https://medium.com/@nickf4rr/hi-im-nick-farr-nickf4rr-35c32f13da4d
>   https://hypatia.ca/2016/06/07/he-said-they-said/
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:06 PM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>      I subxcribe to the Noisebridge-announce mailing
>> list. Today I received email from
>>
>> noisebridge at riseup.net
>>
>> sent to the Noisebridge-announce list. Here is the
>> entire content of the body of the message:
>>
>> https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Noisebridge_Statement_on_Jacob_Appelbaum
>>
>>
>>
>> Below is my reply to the message:
>>
>>     This is coming out of the blue for me. I have
>> heard no claims against Jake for any reason.
>>
>>     My questions are
>> * who wrote this
>> * what is the basis of the claims against Jake?
>>
>>    The anonymity of the writer makes me suspicious.
>>    The lack of information behind the primary claim
>> makes me suspicious.
>>    This may be an artifact of a smear campaign.
>>
>>    I'm presenting my concern to the Noisebridge-discuss
>> mailing list hoping for information. I really hope
>> this does not develop into an emotional discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20160610/90d811b8/attachment-0003.html>