[Noisebridge-discuss] What happened?

[Victoria Fierce]

Casey's right, I do remember banning them once or twice.

...do we really need to speculate on why they should be considered
banned? IRC bans don't traditionally extend to the 86 page.

On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 05:45 -0700, Marc Juul wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Casey Callendrello <c1 at caseyc.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > On 5/24/16 2:24 AM, Robert "Finny" Merrill wrote:
> > > This is an actual conversation I just had on #noisebridge:
> > > http://hastebin.com/raw/ramuhatexe
> > > 
> > > What happened, folks? Did this community lose all sense of social
> > > responsibility? Since when is this kind of attitude welcome?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > 
> > (resending 'cos my first message was lost somehow)
> > 
> > This individual has long been banned from #noisebridge for doing
> > exactly
> > this, and occasionally evades the ban. Sorry that nobody was around
> > when
> > they got back in.
> > 
> > 
> Really? I thought he was banned but he's not on the noisebridge 86
> wiki
> page. If he was actually banned could someone add him and the reason?
> If it
> was for safe space reasons then he'll also be added to the sudo room
> ban
> list.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20160525/d7951600/attachment-0003.sig>